
Recently, Pres. Benigno Aquino III said that traffic is a sign that the Philippine economy is booming. For him, it only shows that many Filipino families are improving their lives because they can afford to buy a vehicle. It is so good to hear these words from our president if his observation is realistic. Maybe he is only giving an applause to his administration; under his governance, he made a great contribution to the lives of many Filipino people. He and his cabinets are claiming that the economic growth of our country was dramatically increased.
But
is it true that traffic is a sign to say that our country is becoming
progressive? Maybe in another country this is very true. For them, to have a
car is just a necessity and not a luxury. Even ordinary people have their own
car. But here in the Philippines, it is hard to claim it when you knew that
poverty is very rampant. Look only to the sidewalk and you will see a lot of
beggars and homeless people. The indigenous people like Badjao are also roaming
around the metro to alms.
Why
Mr. President is using traffic as a parameter to measure the condition of our
economy? Even traffic enforcers would not say this. For them and for ordinary
people, traffic is just giving an headache. Does the president already hear the
opinion of any economic expert? They are saying that traffic is a big hindrance
for the growth of our economy. Because of traffic many gasoline would be
consumed and people are becoming unproductive because many of them are become
late to their works. If we will count the money that become were gone because
of traffic it would be millions or even billion. It is very contrary to the
statement of P-Noy that traffic is a good for our economy.
If
it is true that the economy of the Philippines is blooming, then, we have a lot
of train transit here like in progressive countries that they have no problem
about mass transportation. Here, the government is complaining to their subsidy
in MRT and LRT. That’s why they want to privatize or they want to raise it fair
price.
No comments:
Post a Comment